![]() |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Last Updated: Friday, December 22, 2006
Type: Default
Keywords: Case Study: Electronic Apparatus
Case Study: Electronic Apparatus
Case Study: Electronic Apparatus
Sorting out the coverage for electronic apparatus is one of the most challenging aspects of dealing with the ISO Homeowners policy. With the 1991 revision of the contract, the coverage has changed. There is currently an exclusion for one type of electronic apparatus and limitations on another kind. ELECTRONIC APPARATUSWhile electronic apparatus is not defined in the policy, there is a wide variety of equipment that contains electronic components including such things as laptops, televisions, radios, CD players, CB radios, electronic offices, and many others. The current Homeowners policy distinguishes between two types of electronic apparatus:
Before we look at the way the Homeowners policy responds to these two types of electronic apparatus, it is important to mention that when the policy deals with electronic apparatus, it includes:
APPARATUS EXCLUDEDThe third exclusion under the Property Not Covered section of the Homeowners policy is the motor vehicle exclusion. This exclusion applies not only to the vehicle itself, but also some electronic apparatus. The apparatus that can only be operated from the electrical system of a motor vehicle is excluded from coverage "while the property is in or upon the vehicle or conveyance." A CB radio, for example, is not covered under the Homeowners policy if it is destroyed or stolen while in the vehicle itself.APPARATUS SUBJECT TO LIMITATIONSOn page 2 of the ISO Homeowners policy one finds a list of personal property that is subject to limitations. There is a limit of $200 on money and $1000 on boats. With the 1991 revision of the Homeowners policy, ISO has added an additional condition to limitation #9, which is the limitation for business property off the premises. At the same time, two new limitations, #10 and #11, have been added.We will first review the two exclusions that apply to business personal property, and then explore the two that apply to electronic apparatus. Limitations #8 and #9 apply to business personal property:
Because we are already familiar with the above limitations, we know there is a limit of $2500 on business personal property while on the premises, and $250 for the property when off the premises. The area bolded is the new language that has been added with the 1991 revision. It states that the $250 limitation does not apply to electronic apparatus limited in Special Limits #10 and #11. Let’s look at Special Limits #10 and #11, in turn.
This limitation also applies only to adaptable electronic apparatus. It applies only when the equipment is used for business. Coverage for adaptable electronic apparatus is limited to $1000 when the equipment is not on the "residence premises" and is not in or upon a motor vehicle. A laptop used in business and stolen from the airport would be covered for only $1000. The dollar limits on these two limitations can be increased by use of the ISO endorsement, HO 04 65 04 91, COVERAGE C INCREASED SPECIAL LIMITS OF LIABILITY. With this endorsement the dollar limits on limitations #10 and #11 can be increased from $1000 up to $5000. The other way to cover the exposures is to specifically schedule the electronic apparatus, taking into consideration any business use. SKIP’S PROBLEMThe coverage the Homeowners policy affords for Skip’s laptop will vary significantly depending on where the laptop was at the time of loss. The fact that Skip uses the laptop in his business will also impact recovery. Let’s look at what Skip can expect under various scenarios:
THE BOTTOM LINEWe have been discussing the ISO Homeowners policy and how it applies to electronic apparatus. When writing a Homeowners there are two specific recommendations:Electronic Apparatus Electronic apparatus includes: Adaptable Electronic Apparatus Used In Business No Business Use Excluded Electronic Apparatus
The Homeowners policy excludes this property from coverage "only while the property is in or upon the vehicle or conveyance." This article is excerpted from the book Case Studies In Personal Lines, written by Phyllis Van Wyhe, CPCU, CIC.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||